Author Topic: TARDIS  (Read 2946 times)

Offline bn

  • Titanium Physicist
  • Administrator
  • Godzilla!!!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Compressing Hearts, Super Robo Style
    • View Profile
    • The Titanium Physicists Podcast
TARDIS
« on: October 30, 2013, 07:30:31 PM »
so we made a TARDIS spacetime.
you can read about it here.

perhaps you would like me to explain it to you? WE ALSO WROTE AN AWESOME WHITE PAPER.
 
Titanium Physicists has a pro-bee-analogy agenda. That's certainly no secret.

Offline Psydotek

  • Miocene Terror Bird
  • *******
  • Posts: 118
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Papanicolaou test ninja.
    • View Profile
Re: TARDIS
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2013, 08:08:44 PM »
Ya'll have been popular on twitter today about that.  :)

I submitted a tip to www.io9.com about it, maybe they'll run a story on it...

Offline bn

  • Titanium Physicist
  • Administrator
  • Godzilla!!!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Compressing Hearts, Super Robo Style
    • View Profile
    • The Titanium Physicists Podcast
Re: TARDIS
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2013, 10:39:23 PM »
thanks.

ughh. i've been thinking about the fact that the CPC doesn't apply to it. I don't recall any mention in hawking's paper (which i re-read prior to making any claims) about the weak energy condition... but that's an obvious condition to put on it... and wikipedia claims that there's a weak energy component to the CPC.
anyway, i doubt anyone will care that hawking's conjecture doesn't apply to this case.
too bad.

now i'm feeling crappy about ye paper. i'm glad i submitted it for publication already. i don't think i care enough about it anymore. *exhausted*
Titanium Physicists has a pro-bee-analogy agenda. That's certainly no secret.

Offline Psydotek

  • Miocene Terror Bird
  • *******
  • Posts: 118
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Papanicolaou test ninja.
    • View Profile
Re: TARDIS
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2013, 09:18:35 AM »